On 19 Jan 2001, at 20:16, Scott C. Best wrote:
[Someone said:]
> > I found an early back-port of cramfs. Still no luck with ramfs.
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0011.0/1019.html
> >
> > Are these file systems useful for a 2.2 system, or should we just try to
> > use them on Charles's new 2.4 kernel? David, Charles any opinions?
> So...can someone relate the quantitive advantages of cramfs or
> ramfs for me? Filesize savings, glib compatibility, etc.
I must be WAAAAAY behind the curve on this one :-(
What is ramfs? What is cramfs? Why do I care? What do I get?
What's wrong with what the current versions of the filesystems out
there?
Can someone enlighten this compleat idiot? :-)
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
