<x-flowed>At 03:44 PM 1/19/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 19 Jan 2001, at 20:16, Scott C. Best wrote:
>
>[Someone said:]
> > > I found an early back-port of cramfs. Still no luck with ramfs.
> > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0011.0/1019.html
> > >
> > > Are these file systems useful for a 2.2 system, or should we just try to
> > > use them on Charles's new 2.4 kernel? David, Charles any opinions?
>
> > So...can someone relate the quantitive advantages of cramfs or
> > ramfs for me? Filesize savings, glib compatibility, etc.
>
>I must be WAAAAAY behind the curve on this one :-(
>
>What is ramfs? What is cramfs? Why do I care? What do I get?
>What's wrong with what the current versions of the filesystems out
>there?
>
>Can someone enlighten this compleat idiot? :-)
Scott & David,
Here is a link to a conversation on kernel-traffic with Linus about cramfs
and ramfs.
http://kt.linuxcare.com/kernel-traffic/kt20000821_81.epl#1
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
