yup, that's it -- Danbury would be SNET territory, right?
Man, I haven't had to deal with modems in a long while
(auto-configuring PCMCIA modems on modern hardware excepted). I'm
getting close though -- hardware is good, chat script is munged.
Whatever.
--
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: It's what's for dinner!
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, George Metz wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > unless project pronto is still moving forward, IDSL and wireless are my
> > only choices. When I left SBC there was some question about the FCC
> > allowing pronto to continue...
>
> Is Project Pronto the one I read about where they're setting up
> mini-DSLAMs out in the field and running fibre back to the COs to
> "extend" the distance on the DSL availability? If so, I know that Covad
> was participating in some field trials with it in Danbury Connecticut
> about three or four months ago...
>
> --
> George Metz
> Commercial Routing Engineer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction' during
> the Cold War. But what is deterrence in information warfare?" -- Brigadier
> General Douglas Richardson, USAF, Commander - Space Warfare Center
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
