David Douthitt wrote: > > bzip2 is supposed to be pretty good; why not use root.tgz and all the > rest are *.bgz or whatever the standard is.... but then, there > probably isn't any. The zip code for root.tgz is contained within the > kernel, so you could actually remove gzip and use bzip2. The only > problem is you couldn't modify root.tgz ... > And another problem is that any conventional root.lrp contains glibc and busybox and ash, which is probably the largest part of most lrp systems. I wonder if it will pay off in terms of diskspace to have a larger root.lrp (with bzip2 added) when you can only compress non-root packages with bzip2 Ewald Wasscher _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging thc
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging thc
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging thc
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging thc
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging jdnewmil
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging George Metz
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Ewald Wasscher
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging George Metz
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Packaging George Metz