>       Just wanted to confirm that ipmasqadm portfw
> can *only* handle tcp and udp right now behind the -P
> switch. Yes?

I believe so.

>       If so...then to confirm: IPSec (even using
> *only* tunnel-mode ESP and not AH) and PPTP must 
> terminate on a masq'ing firewall router right now.
> Or, is there some other way to forward IP protocols
> 47, 50 and 51.

yes using ipfwd and ipmasqadm,
this might not be what you wanted, but I'll still post it, I once saw in a
*sort of ipsec how-to* the use of ipfwd to forward generic ip trafic:

ipfwd -masq <interal_machine> 50 &

here is a link to an lrp post about it: (masqed server pptp example)
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/Linux/303/0/5255880/

>       Also...has anyone built a redir.lrp or IPFwd.lrp
> package yet, or have I found something else to do? :)
>       Thanks!

my lrp 2.9.4 has IPFwd, don't know about the other distros.
hope to have helped.

another thing, is anyone *building* an iptables rule set yet?
I'm, and I'd like to compare/enhance it.
made a stand_alone_with_internet_connection rule set, am doing a simple masq
router rule set, when finished I'll move to the full multi_homed routing
with dmz.

I've seen some sparse examples, some with nonsense rules, some completely
wrong rules, some right but too simple!!!

anyone?

pedro

> -Scott
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to