On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 527k Apr 22 16:17 bzImage
>
> George,
> I'd be interested in the results of killing ipfwadm only, also. I know it's
> more work, and I'm only curious. So, do what you feel is best. :)
Not much more work, and I'm blessed with an efficient processor. =)
However, just removing ipfwadm doesn't change the kernel size at all,
unfortunately. Removing both ipchains and ipfwadm still doesn't change
anything. Wierd.
Doh!
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 481k Apr 23 14:51 bzImage
That's much more like it. Somehow, the PCI Device Name Database snuck BACK
IN to the config, and it was throwing everything off. =) The above is with
IPTables/IPChains support added.
I'm going to work on this a bit, and will get back to everyone as soon as
I can get this at least down to the size it was.
> On another topic, has anyone used the SF compile farm? Does compiling
> against glibc 2.0.7 work? It looks like SF wants to eventually allow
> projects to make nightly builds from CVS.
I don't think so. The Linux/x86 system is running Debian Potato.
--
George Metz
Commercial Routing Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction' during
the Cold War. But what is deterrence in information warfare?" -- Brigadier
General Douglas Richardson, USAF, Commander - Space Warfare Center
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
