<x-flowed>At 02:20 PM 2/2/01 -0800, Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't like the idea of a standard interface for all the flavors of Lrp.
>I like it when there's differences and when people follow their own quest
>for glory. I like innovation and non-standard apps. I can't stand the
>way most windows programs look the same. I enjoy it when people develop
>their own methods for solving an issue, especially when their solution is
>modular. I don't like the possiblilty of some XML design parameters
>reigning in people's work away from what they consider to be the best
>solution to a specific issue. I would like to see other flavors of Lrp.I
>like the freedom to work with the well known programs that compose Lrp. It
>would bother me to be a slave to firewall.conf. I am against umbrella
>standards, in general, because I'm unconventional.
Matt,
I agree with the paragraph above. I don't think anyone here is suggesting
that David, Charles, or you have to use this. If you find it useful great.
If not, that's fine too. There is plenty of room for different LEAF
releases. I want us to be inclusive, not exclusive.
>Just my little old opinion, not well reasoned, and probably flawed,
The reasoning looked fine to me. :)
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
