Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Matt,
> I agree with the paragraph above. I don't think anyone here is suggesting
> that David, Charles, or you have to use this. If you find it useful great.
> If not, that's fine too. There is plenty of room for different LEAF
> releases. I want us to be inclusive, not exclusive.
>
> >Just my little old opinion, not well reasoned, and probably flawed,
>
> The reasoning looked fine to me. :)
Thanks Mike.
I feel much better now that I've had lunch. :)
I guess, of the top of my head, I didn't see how it'd be easy
for all the programs that create a running Lrp configuration to
be ported over to supporting a firewall.conf.
It's seems topical, though, and a logical step in the evolution
of Lrp builds, to want to gain a certain amount of centralized
control over what a build does, in light of the fact that the
major flavors out there are nearing a mature state.
Best,
Matt
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
