On Sat, 19 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Mike Noyes, 2001-05-19 07:14 -0700
> >We agree the package tree needs categories. Now the hard part, what should
> >they be? I think we need a "scripts" category. I have my doubts about
> >using a "net" category, because most of our packages fit into it.
>
> Everyone,
> What about the following four categories?
>
> daemon
> client
> script
> app
That'd work great... for minor categories. What I think we SHOULD be doing
is basing this on functionality for the main distro trees. Some packages
fit under multiple categories above, so...
cvsroot
|
|
|---- Firewall
| |---- Daemon
| |---- Client
| |---- Script
| |---- LRP
|
|---- System Management
| |---- Daemon
...and so on.
Gimme a bit and I'll come up with a list of the categories that would work
under what I'm thinking. I made the horrendous mistake of purchasing
Asheron's Call on Saturday as a birthday present to myself, so I'll be a
bit slow.
--
George Metz
Commercial Routing Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction' during
the Cold War. But what is deterrence in information warfare?" -- Brigadier
General Douglas Richardson, USAF, Commander - Space Warfare Center
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
