Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Mike Noyes, 2001-05-19 07:14 -0700
> >We agree the package tree needs categories. Now the hard part, what should
> >they be? I think we need a "scripts" category. I have my doubts about
> >using a "net" category, because most of our packages fit into it.
>
> Everyone,
> What about the following four categories?
>
> daemon
> client
> script
> app
I must say, I don't care for these. Seems too messy to me.
What about a shell script which runs as a client or a server depending
on which way it's called? It would fit into all four categories.
What about a server written in C that only runs from inetd? That
would fit almost nowhere.
I do like "net" as it describes the function of the program. So what
if everything falls under there? At least a category like net would
separate things like zebra out from things like xinetd or lilo - I've
at least tried to compile all three.
The only unresolved question I would have is - what about glibc-2.1
and glibc-2.2 compiled binaries?
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
