On Sat, 26 May 2001, Arne Bernin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i didn't wrote when you where discussing it (Quite busy with other things),
> but my "dream" is to have a lrp/leaf system based on uClibc.
> It is not usable for this right now but seems to go right into that
> direction, and if it supports enough functions/binaries i would vote for that.
> It is small and is good supported, although it may not be possible to
> compile every program, but as more people seem to use this for their
> embedded systems more programs that are really needed for
> routing/scripting/firewalling should work than.
>
> So maybe in half a year it gets really usable.
>
> So what do you think (or did you already discuss this and i missed it ???)
I'd much rather be going that way than follow the perpetual spiral of
incompatible glibc updates, since I'm convinced that we haven't seen the
last of this and glibc2.3 shall again make us wail out loud about our woe.
LRP is an embedded target, if anything I'd want a mean, lean, stable and
small libc. Harder to compile? That's what you get if you want things
to be not bloated :).
Cheers,
Pi
--
Head Development - Vuurwerk Internet (http://www.vuurwerk.nl/)
Brainbench MVP Unix Programming, twisted artist and Free Software idiot.
I need a mental stoma.
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
