Morgan Reed, 2001-06-14 01:27 -0400
>To all,
>While I am still willing to sign and send out an open letter, I believe
>it is probably unnecessary.
Morgan,
Thank you for taking the time to write the open letter. You did a great job
late at night for our benefit, and I appreciate it. That said I agree with
you that it's unnecessary to send it at this time.
>I guess at this point I would like to ask Mike if he thinks we should
>have a show of (electronic) hands and either put it to bed or go
>forward.
Since some of our developers are uncomfortable with an open letter, I don't
think a vote is appropriate. Please, let me know if I'm wrong.
>If any of you would like to use the draft that I floated earlier as part
>of your own comment, either to LRP list or to anyone else, please
>consider the draft GPL'd I guess :).
This is probably the best use for the letter.
>P.S. I guess the next step will be spreading the word that the LRP
>truly lives on in LEAF, and making sure that new users know to visit us
>on sourceforge.
This brings up a question that was posted to leaf-user yesterday. How
should we respond to it?
~ From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~ To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~ Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:32:07 -0500
~ Subject: [Leaf-user] 2.0.x LRP's
~
~ Are the standard LRP (2.9.8) images going to be maintained still? For
~ those of us still using the 2.0.x kernel based LRP's?
>P.P.S. what steps have been taken to store and or mirror sourceforge
>locally should VA Linux go away?
I backup our web site, and the content in the DocManager here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/archives/
SourceForge also backs up all projects regularly. If someone wishes to make
a backup that is independent of the SourceForge site, let me know. Note: it
will require approximately 1-2G of storage.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
