At 11:13 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Steven Peck wrote >A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its >administrator that updates are needed. > >------------------------------------- >I don't necessarily agree with this. Part of the appeal of a base config'd >system for me is that even if it is hacked, there arn't many tools to use. >Remote update tools on my system would annoy me. I don't want it talking. Like most everything else LRP, an update checker should be a package. Use it or not as you choose. >Hell, I don't always know when my Windows system is trying to talk to >Microsoft. :-)
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Pim van Riezen
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Charles Steinkuehler
- [Leaf-devel] Scenarios David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Mike Sensney
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Mike Sensney
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Mike Noyes
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Steven Peck
- [Leaf-devel] gcc-3.0 Mike Sensney
- [Leaf-devel] gcc-3.0 Mike Sensney
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement Mike Sensney
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement jdnewmil
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement David Douthitt