i just had a look and a i like the idea of putting this on CD (We are selling our systems with an IDE Flashdisk, though). But, i would like to see the config scripts be seperate from the configs itself, thats one difference to the release i made for myself.
CS> What exactly do you mean here? The other is of course Kernel 2.4... CS> I plan on re-working pretty much everything and making a 2.4 kernel based firewall, with uClibc (for small floppies & limited functionality systems) and optional support for current glibc libraries for folks with the space and need to run it. But i like the new lrcfg interface it looks nice. But please change the description there: b <pgkg>) Backup d <pgkg>) Set Backup Destination and so on, i tried multiple time to insert: d root ... <pkgnum> or something like that would be nicer... CS> I'll change this in the next release. As a seperate issue, would it be better to use the package names, or stick with the numbers, or maybe even support both (should be possible, as long as no-one makes a 3.lrp package :)? Also, you can use E and L (upper or lower case) for package "numbers" with the b, d, and t commands, as well (this may also not be obvious). CS> Actually, I couldn't wait...Being a firm believer in the concept that things should work as expected, I modified the script to accept either a package name or number, with the following package names as special cases: e E all everything - Backup all packages l L - Backup everything but logs Now, whatever you think <pkg> is, the scripts will probably do what you want...this functionality will be in the next release. Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
