David,
I should know better than to post this early in the morning. I didn't
express myself well. See in-line comments below for an explanation. Sorry. :-(
At 2002-02-16 05:42 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 2002-02-16 07:25 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>>On 2/15/02 at 10:15 PM, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Perhaps what we NEED is a test suite - a sort of
>> > minimalist "autoconf" which details what works and what
>> > doesn't...
>>
>>Like this:
>>
>>Checking for busybox date.... no
>>Checking for busybox install.... no
>>Checking for ip... yes
>>Checking for netstat... no
>>Checking for route... no
>>Checking for ifconfig... no
>>
>>...etc...
>
>David,
>Would it be possible to apply something like this to package testing.
Scratch the question above and replace it with:
Would it be possible to parse the autoconf output above for package testing?
> e.g.
Checking package file structure: OK
>Checking for program name: foo.bar
>Checking for program version: 1.00
>Checking for libc version: 2.1.3
>Checking compatibility with Bering...
Parsing Bering autoconf output: no
>Checking compatibility with Dachstein...
Parsing Dachstein autoconf output: no
>Checking compatibility with Oxygen...
Parsing Oxygen autoconf output: yes
>Checking compatibility with PacketFilter: no
Parsing PacketFilter autoconf output: no
>Checking compatibility with WRP: no
Parsing WRP autoconf output: no
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000&page_id=4
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
