"Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
> 
> David Douthitt wrote:

[snip]

> > Not only is standardization impossible, but the little variances are
> > what makes a distribution individual and perhaps better than others.
> 
> Nothing is impossible.
> 
> In fact, your dependent clause, again, is my point!  We have something
> in LEAF that is unique and worth defining better.


And I think that's where some people miss the point.  LEAF is 
not one thing, nor one project.  It's an place for people who 
build Linux Embedded Appliances to gather and develop their 
whosymawhatchits.  I never was under the impression that any
two LEAF projects had to have anything in common at all.

Dave is expressing that the individuality of one person's
project that happens to be developed on leaf.sf.net, when
compared to another developed on the same leaf.sf.net,
is what makes them unique, special, stand on their own merit.

What other seem to want to do is compare a non-existent
sort of "semi-official because it follows a standard"
LEAF distro with some other persons floppy OS project, 
perhaps freesco or something.

That doesn't work.  This place is just a central location
for people to congregate.  I don't think it's a top down,
standards producing enumeration of anything.  But that's
just what I took from Mike Noyes's explanation of what
LEAF was when I joined.

Regards

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to