> Everyone, > Apparently it's a non-trivial task to determine the minor version of > libc used for package creation. Tomorrow I'm going to start committing > our packages to cvs with the following tree structure: > > bin/packages + /glibc2.0 > | > + /glibc2.1 > > Should I use libc6 and libc6.1 instead of glibc? > > Commits will include the following information if known: > Program name: > Program version: > Packager: > Creation Date: > > I'll place all of the packages that require libc.so.6 in the glibc2.0 > directory. The few packages that don't depend on any libc will be placed > in the bin/packages directory.
How about using bin/packages/nolibc (or similar) instead? Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
