On 16 Apr 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
[...]
> Everyone,
> Apparently it's a non-trivial task to determine the minor version of
> libc used for package creation. Tomorrow I'm going to start committing
> our packages to cvs with the following tree structure:
>
> bin/packages + /glibc2.0
> |
> + /glibc2.1
>
> Should I use libc6 and libc6.1 instead of glibc?
No. Both glibc2.0 and glibc2.1 get stored in libc.so.6... glibc ignores
the shared library versioning conventions.
[...]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
