> Who determines what keywords and categories apply to each package? I > believe these tags will cause confusion if there is no set > categorization template.
Maybe there should be one file templated out with certain information, like source version, package revision, packagename, glibc-required, maintainer, etc.... put a space/comma seperated line similar to the LRP= line in syslinux.cfg for the repository. This would be easily parsed by awk for administration of the list... but this would require strict adherance to the template format to work. > > > Version: 1.20-1 > > > > upx is not version 1.20-1 but version 1.20 (at least in this > > example). > > In your example, why did you indicate a release level of 1? Is the > release level different than the hyphen would indicate? It would indicate to me that it uses the same compliled source-code, but the package scripting (for .lrp) has been revised/patched. This will likely happen on occasion since the package maintainer does add scripting for use with LEAF. -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ------------------------------------------------------- -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
