> > Another point, is the handling of /lib/modules. > > Charles approach in Dachstein-CD has been an intelligent /etc/modules and > > load process - with mount/umount commands and cd capabilty. Eric create a > > link and hold the CD mount in /cdmnt. Couldn't decide, which way is > > better... > > Any feedback from the list on this issue ?
I'd just like to point out that the mount/umount commands I proivded when processing /etc/modules were intentionally made general purpose enough to support devices *OTHER* than the CD (ie hard-disk, flash-disk, etc), and even the possability of loading modules from multiple devices. I can't comment on Eric's solution, since I'm not familiar with it, but I'd vote for whichever allows the most flexible run-time configuration (even if it's not my solution :-), as long as there are no big space problems (the extra code to process mount commands in /etc/modules was pretty small...I don't know about Eric's solution). Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
