> On Monday 08 July 2002 08:55, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Mosquito > > From what I was able to glean from babelfish, it looks like > > Mosquito was purchased by a VPN company (SeSame), renamed to IPnuts, > > and was taken commercial. Does anyone have information on Mosquito > > development status? > > http://babelfish.altavista.com/urltrurl?lp=ja_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww > >.s-me.co.jp%2Fnews%2F020516.html > > It appears that they now a cd-release for sale and have/working-on a > 2.4.x kernel with VPN, SSL, and *SQL capabilities. I'd like to know what > is going on since they are now commercially owned and we haven't heard > from anyone since the buyout.
Mosquito changed the name to IPnuts 3.4. 2.2.20 kernel VPN SSL support. not SQL. but VPN was not ditributed online. > > > Corporate Affiliates proposal: > > I'd like us to start affiliating with corporations. However, I'm > > unsure of the point where we should consider a company for > > affiliation. Do they need to provide code resources and a link > > back to us for consideration, or just a link back to us? Examples: * > > Echogent: fwlog.pl cgi-script, Echowall, ftp white paper, Scott Best > > is a project member. > > * SeSame: Mosquito image, various packages, Webadmin, and > > reciprocal link. > > * Bits Over Atoms: Reciprocal link to us. > > If they're gleaning LEAF GPL'ed code and charging for it, it would seem > fair ....(fill in the blank). :-( Packages in http://www.s-me.co.jp/mosquito/mos3_4/packages/ are GPL lisence.(and Other open source license decided by Auther.) WebAdmin is GPL. ( only japanese. a part is english) but, since we assert license, the user interface code of WebAdmin for [, such as VPN, ] a specific package is unacquirable in online. WebAdmin has the menu form which can be added. # And If not related to me, WebAdmin is used also for # firewall distribution of Japan in time. config.lrp is also my code. it is GPL.This can gather configuration file written xxxx.conf. I think that it is useful. Webadmin.lrp,config.lrp,rc.lrp ,etc.lrp and root.lrp can not use other leaf distribution ,since they are imcompatible. But other packages may be compatible with little modify,I think. A part of them includes code for Webadmin and rc.( but they are gpl.) But when webadmin is upgraded, a license may change. # I'm developing kernel 2.4. It is going to use the linuxrc code of Bering. # I am thankful to many developers. > > Paying for Consulting and site setup is fine with me (I do a little of > this), but sale of the software (and in particular closing of code) is > quite another, IMHO. > > > Consultant List proposal: > > I'd like us to create a web page with links or contact > > information of consultants willing to contract for LEAF > > installations. Should we use the linuxports.com site for listings, or > > something else? > > This sounds good to me. I really don't know how consultants could be > qualified by the project though. It could be rather easy to get over > your head in a short-term project. > > > These proposals may not be good ideas, but I thought they should be > > discussed. > Discussion is a good idea! :-) > -- > > ~Lynn Avants > aka Guitarlynn > > guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net > http://leaf.sourceforge.net > > If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Oh, it's good to be a geek. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > Leaf-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
