On 2002.09.22_01:09:25_+0000, guitarlynn wrote: > > [1] build an updated libssl.lrp [2] compile my zebra package with > > libcrypto statically linked > > > I would agree that option [2] would likely be the better of the two > choices. You are about as far along with a Zebra/LEAF disk as I was > when thinking about something similar several months ago. I know that > Zebra isn't going to fit on a floppy, but SSL is a huge package that > could present problems as well as benefits in the long run. Statically > linking the library simply limits the drawbacks to including the > entire library.
I second that. libssl.lrp itself is 398007 bytes, and about 1 megabyte uncompressed. Unless there are a lot of apps you intend to install use the library, I can only see a few points on installing the whole "huge" package. A few points I meant here, and may be what Lynn referred to as benefits, are availability of the library in the future and sharability. -- H. D. Lee ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
