On 2002.09.22_01:09:25_+0000, guitarlynn wrote:
> >     [1] build an updated libssl.lrp [2] compile my zebra package with
> >     libcrypto statically linked
> >
> I would agree that option [2] would likely be the better of the two
> choices. You are about as far along with a Zebra/LEAF disk as I was
> when thinking about something similar several months ago.  I know that
> Zebra isn't going to fit on a floppy, but SSL is a huge package that
> could present problems as well as benefits in the long run. Statically
> linking the library simply limits the drawbacks to including the
> entire library. 

I second that. libssl.lrp itself is 398007 bytes, and about 1 megabyte
uncompressed. Unless there are a lot of apps you intend to install use
the library, I can only see a few points on installing the whole "huge"
package. A few points I meant here, and may be what Lynn referred to as
benefits, are availability of the library in the future and sharability.

-- 
H. D. Lee



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to