On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:29, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: > I did not understand the end of your mail, but I always disliked node3.
K.-P., The end of my message was just an example of our current system to clarify my proposed change. I guess it didn't successfully achieve my desired goal. I apologize for confusing the dialog. One vote for omitting node3 from our future FRS releases. > Am Montag, 6. Januar 2003 19:56 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > Everyone, > > I think we can remove node3 from our pseudo-directory structure in the > > SF FRS. The SF staff changed the default MIME type to > > application/octet-stream for all files. This means we no longer have to > > be concerned with the extension name of node4. Opinions? > > > > How do I submit my contribution for release in the "Files" section? > > https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1464&group_id=13751 > > > > The reason for our current workaround with example. > > The SF FRS only provides a single directory for all of our files at: > > http://dl.sourceforge.net/leaf/ > > > > node1 = FRS Package = Bering-uClibc > > node2 = FRS Release = 1.0-stable > > node3 = File type = img > > node4 = Filename = bering-uclibc-1680.bin > > = bering-uclibc-1680.exe > > > > The first three nodes are pseudo-directory structure. If the SF FRS > > supported subdirectories it would look like this: > > > > leaf/Bering-uClibc + > > > > | /1.0-stable + > > | > > | /img + > > | > > | /bering-uclibc-1680.bin > > | /bering-uclibc-1680.exe -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
