On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 10:19, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 09:45, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > d) New LEAF release/branch specific MLs. > > > leaf-bering > > > leaf-dachstein > > > leaf-lince > > > leaf-oxygen > > > leaf-packetfilter > > > leaf-wisp-dist > > Add to d) leaf-general, or some such.
Michael, Please explain how a general/discuss list would reduce traffic on leaf-user. > If this is divvied up to fine, > then how will the generalists lend support? Agreed. I have a couple of additional problems with the release/branch split above. It almost doubles my ML admin load. Second, once a list is created on SF it can't be removed or renamed. If we had used the release/branch solution from day one we would have two dead lists currently (leaf-eigerstein, leaf-wrp). > > e) Split leaf-user by adding > > leaf-user-new I'm not sure how much of a traffic reduction would be achieved by splitting new user questions to a new ML. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
