On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 11:16, Vladimir I. wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote about "Re: [leaf-devel] ML volume": > > If we decide to create release/branch specific lists, I will create one > > for each of our releases/branches. It's the only fair thing to do. > > Mike, depends on how you view it. If we treat mailing lists as > some kind of benefits to the branch authors, then yes, we need to > be fair and everybody should have the same benefits. I wouldn't > treat them like that. I'd rather treat mailing lists as a tool > for communication and their splitting as a way to reduce load on > the readers.
Vladimir, Right now I view them as a common communication medium. As soon as we attach release/branch names to MLs, I feel I have to treat them as a release/branch resource. > As for web-based forums - personally I don't like them because > they're inconvinient. Especially considering that I have 500+ ms > ping to Sourceforge. I agree. I'm especially concerned with diagnostic information (line wrapping, etc.). -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
