On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:20, Matt Schalit wrote: > Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > [4] What about this write protect issue? Is it safe to assume that > > _all_ units have this facility? What is the nomenclature to communicate > > this requirement to vendors? > > > Isn't the ADM DOM the only write protectable device, as > told by Mike Noyes? My CF certainly isn't.
Matt, The SST/Apacer ADM is the only one I'm aware of. I haven't done a search lately though. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
