Ok, I see you really don't like the original uClibc version scheme :) Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 08:31, Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 07:49, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: > > > We need uclibc-0.9.15 like the glibc dirs... > > > > K.-P., > > Would this restructuring be acceptable to the Bering-uClibc team? > > > > D) Move bin/packages/uclibc/linux-2.4.20.upx to bin/bering-uclibc/ . > > Rename bin/packages/uclibc to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9 , and rename > > bin/packages/uclibc/0_9_15 to bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/15 . > > > > This would prevent directory sprawl, and allow the Bering-uClibc team to > > create uClibc bug-fix revision directories in bin/pakcages/uclibc-0.9 to > > address compatibility issues (e.g. 15, 18, etc.). A README in uclibc-0.9 > > indicating what the subdirectories contain would probably be > > appropriate. > > > > Structure of proposed change: > > > > toplevel/ > > - bin/ > > -- uclibc-0.9/ > > --- 15/ > > --- 18/ > > K.-P., > I forgot to add the packages directory to the example above. Sorry. > > toplevel/ > - bin/ > -- packages/ > --- uclibc-0.9/ > ---- 15/ > ---- 18
ok we move everything frrom uclibc to bering-uclibc and from uclibc/0_9_15 to uclibc-0.9/15 Will you add uclibc-0.9 to cvs? kp ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
