Erich Titl wrote:
It would (and hopefully will) be - but unless I completely misunderstood what they're working on, it doesn't adress all the aspects of updating packages (and I don't think it should either).If anybody has some great ideas, I'd love to hear them (anything I could come up with, like extracting the packages in /tmp and replacing everything but the files mentioned in the packagename.conf file sounded like a dirty hack to me, especially since it may cause problems if the updated package actually requires updating the config...)
I was under the impression that the config system by Chad, Lynn et al would be a step in this direction, else I did not get its meaning.
So yes, the new config system should make things easier, but even after it has been adopted by the LEAF branches, we still won't have a system to keep a LEAF box up to date (please correct me if I'm mistaken).
Martin
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
