Martin At 22:49 10.02.2004 +0100, Martin Hejl wrote: >It would (and hopefully will) be - but unless I completely misunderstood what they're >working on, it doesn't adress all the aspects of updating packages (and I don't think >it should either). > >So yes, the new config system should make things easier, but even after it has been >adopted by the LEAF branches, we still won't have a system to keep a LEAF box up to >date (please correct me if I'm mistaken).
I guess one of the most important issues here is to split config and logic data. If that can be achieved then theoretically we should be able to just replace the logic while maintaining the configuration. However, this is not an easy task as the packages come from so many different sources which do not have a common configuration structure. Maybe this is the ultimate challenge for a community project. Erich THINK P�ntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
