Subject was Re: [leaf-devel] New Website & IE On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 08:16, Tom Eastep wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > As always, everyone's opinion is valuable. This is how we reach > > consensus. > > I'm not sure that I had anything valuable to say in the first place. I > should have taken a deep breath and counted to 10 before jumping into > this discussion.
Tom, I think the topics you brought up are relevant to shorewall and leaf integration. I know you've expressed concerns with LEAF branch scripting (ash, busybox) limitations in the past. Any suggestions (lua, ruby, etc.) you have are welcome. Maybe even contemplating a static target build from a Shorewall host script is an option. I wasn't aware that LEAF package format was of concern too. I know K.-P. is packaging shorewall now, and you support .deb and .rpm. I'm not quite seeing the problem here. Can you clarify the issue? Thanks. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel