Subject was Re: [leaf-devel] New Website & IE
On Sun, 2004-07-04 at 08:16, Tom Eastep wrote: 
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > As always, everyone's opinion is valuable. This is how we reach
> > consensus.
> 
> I'm not sure that I had anything valuable to say in the first place. I 
> should have taken a deep breath and counted to 10 before jumping into 
> this discussion.

Tom,
I think the topics you brought up are relevant to shorewall and leaf
integration.

I know you've expressed concerns with LEAF branch scripting (ash,
busybox) limitations in the past. Any suggestions (lua, ruby, etc.) you
have are welcome. Maybe even contemplating a static target build from a
Shorewall host script is an option.

I wasn't aware that LEAF package format was of concern too. I know K.-P.
is packaging shorewall now, and you support .deb and .rpm. I'm not quite
seeing the problem here. Can you clarify the issue? Thanks.

-- 
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to