Mike Noyes wrote:
I know you've expressed concerns with LEAF branch scripting (ash, busybox) limitations in the past. Any suggestions (lua, ruby, etc.) you have are welcome. Maybe even contemplating a static target build from a Shorewall host script is an option.
I see this as an extension of the general problem for Linux developers that the various Linux distributions are quite incompatible with one another -- LEAF is just more imcompatible.
I wasn't aware that LEAF package format was of concern too. I know K.-P. is packaging shorewall now, and you support .deb and .rpm. I'm not quite seeing the problem here. Can you clarify the issue? Thanks.
The only issue there is that new Shorewall mirror admins need to modify their web server config to handle the non-standard filename extension. Not a big deal but it often gets overlooked and it is just one more case where supporting LEAF requires people to do something differently.
-Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
