On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 13:23, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > But I guess it's worse than you think; if they even read leaf-devel, which I > consider as minimum of engagement, they might have responded themself, if > they think it's a value to be part of LEAF and maintainig a webpage there.
KP, Martin or I should probably contact Vladimir, and inquire if the leaf-wisp-dist mailing list is still necessary. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
