On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 18:58 +0100, Martin Hejl wrote: > > I agree with you, that the main usage scenario is to build a network > > appliance > > with LEAF and most of them also acting as firewall. > > > > Anyway I think it has grown from a "firewall" to a "framework". > That's something I have no issues with - even though, that seems to a > change be the project name, rather than the description (the way I > understand it, the current project name is > > "LEAF - Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall"
"LEAF - Linux Embedded Appliance Framework" Everyone, We seem to have agreement on a name switch from Firewall to Framework. I think we can make this change now, and continue work on a description for later adoption. Is this acceptable? Mike Noyes +1 -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
