Hi everybody,

> the UnNamedOne was a "design study" two years ago by Martin Hejl, which is
> different from Andrews work.
the first part is not quite true - it was a joint effort by Dirk Gförer, 
Eric Spakman and myself (and truth to be told, my part in it probably 
was the smallest one). I just want to make sure I'm not getting praise 
for the work of others.

> That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project, which may
> (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a 2.6 kernel and it
> marks the end of floppy-runnable versions, it shall change the model  that
> just a small, and somewhat closed, group of developers are responsible for a
> stable version of the core and all additional applications/packages. Instead
> the LEAF developers community shall be responsible to provide the best and
> most stable version we can reach.
I agree. And if I can help out by explaining some of the modifications 
we made to make things work with kernel 2.6, I'll gladly do so (if I 
manage to recall why we added some of the changes....)

> I think, once Andrew commits his work into src, we can try to build a new beta
> version and to go on from there with a new name, with a new repository - and
> if necessary with a new version control system. But lets have the code first.
Sounds good to me. Once there is a new branch that is actively 
developed, changing the name or version control system should be easy 
enough.

Martin


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to