> That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project, > which may (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a > 2.6 kernel and it marks the end of floppy-runnable versions, it shall
I'm still running Bering-1.2. I would only wish that the floppy versions should be given the little amount of space they require to remain available on-line for someone who has reason to run that configuration in the future. > version we can reach. So it's a more open approach than we had with > Bering and Bering-uClibc. As may be, but that was very good work done. I always thought setup could have been easier in that old version and contributed some, I hope, helpful criticism from a new user's perspective, but I can't complain about it keeping me safe all these years--albeit I still find the need for an internal firewall as well. Based on my experience I've recommended it to a buddy, and I've almost got a v3.01 box ready to go for him--once I get a replacement for a presumably flakey NIC. > However, your suggestions are appreciated, they are easy to spell > and write, not to mention, that I'm living near the Kattegat and > Skagerag area :) They may be commonplace names to you, and may have sent chills down the spines of my long-ago ancestors, but I think they're fun to say. -- Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
