> That said I hope that both efforts will end up in a joint project,
> which may (or should?) get a new name. Not only that it is based on a
> 2.6 kernel and it marks the end of floppy-runnable versions, it shall

I'm still running Bering-1.2.  I would only wish that the floppy
versions should be given the little amount of space they require to
remain available on-line for someone who has reason to run that
configuration in the future.

> version we can reach. So it's a more open approach than we had with
> Bering and Bering-uClibc.

As may be, but that was very good work done.  I always thought setup
could have been easier in that old version and contributed some, I hope,
helpful criticism from a new user's perspective, but I can't complain
about it keeping me safe all these years--albeit I still find the need
for an internal firewall as well.

Based on my experience I've recommended it to a buddy, and I've almost
got a v3.01 box ready to go for him--once I get a replacement for a
presumably flakey NIC.

> However, your suggestions are appreciated, they are easy to spell
> and write, not to mention, that I'm living near the Kattegat and
> Skagerag area :)

They may be commonplace names to you, and may have sent chills down the
spines of my long-ago ancestors, but I think they're fun to say.
-- 
Paul Rogers
paulgrog...@fastmail.fm
http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)

        

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                          unladen european swallow


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to