Am Dienstag, 28. September 2010, 15:33:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:55 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Am Montag, 27. September 2010, 09:27:37 schrieb davidMbrooke: > -snip- > > > > Out of interest, do we have a standard policy on referencing upstream > > > source files "directly" versus copying them into the LEAF CVS? There > > > are pros and cons both ways... > > > > There is no policy yet, but our rule of thumb sources should be in LEAF > > cvs. > > > > Exceptions are sources that change often and having proofed to be > > reliably available on the net like the kernel and shorewall. > > Source Availability > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki/Controversial%20project%20h > osting#SourceAvailability
Thx for the pointer. AFAIK that reads that we have to provide a tarball of our cvs with each and every release (currently 108M). But do you think that we have to include every source we use as well (gcc, kernel,...)? kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
