* Erich Titl <erich.t...@think.ch> schrieb: > We have SVN as a versioning system and all that happens is that any > binary crap just lands there and produces an enormous binary pile of it. > Correct me, but I believe the S in SCM means 'source'
That's probably one of the reasons, why Git calls itself not an SCM, but an directory content tracker ;-p > I do not see the necessity to keep a tarball in CVS. ACK. IMHO we don't need tarballs at all. Just keep the complete (uncompressed) trees in Git and selectively fetching them on-demand (instead of a full clone). BTW: I'm keeping all sourcetrees and also the sysroot images for my Briegel buildsystem [1] in git. Easier to manage and also performs better than tarballs. cu https://sourceforge.net/p/briegel/home/https://sourceforge.net/p/briegel/home/ -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weig...@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
