Hi Martin,

On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 23:03 +0200, Martin Hejl wrote:
> <snip> My point simply is that we've not been 
> held back by the shortcomings of CVS in any way, as far as I can tell, 
> and that for this reason, switching to another SCM, just because it's 
> "better" might be a waste of resources).

Personally I agree with everything you have said in this and earlier
mails today. CVS is far from perfect but we really don't ask much from
our SCM and CVS does all we need for now. I don't mind switching to an
alternative solution but I can't get excited about it and for me there
are other priorities at the moment - like getting a robust 4.x release
based on a 2.6 kernel, Shorewall 4.4 etc. accompanied by accurate and
useful documentation.


davidMbrooke


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to