Hi Martin, On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 23:03 +0200, Martin Hejl wrote: > <snip> My point simply is that we've not been > held back by the shortcomings of CVS in any way, as far as I can tell, > and that for this reason, switching to another SCM, just because it's > "better" might be a waste of resources).
Personally I agree with everything you have said in this and earlier mails today. CVS is far from perfect but we really don't ask much from our SCM and CVS does all we need for now. I don't mind switching to an alternative solution but I can't get excited about it and for me there are other priorities at the moment - like getting a robust 4.x release based on a 2.6 kernel, Shorewall 4.4 etc. accompanied by accurate and useful documentation. davidMbrooke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel