On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > Ok; I propose: > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't > needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing > or provided as-is.
Just to make sure I understand 100%, some examples: etc.lrp: Certainly part of "core". No debate. asterisk.lrp: Certainly part of "contrib" (only if it is fixed?) aiccu.lrp: Not part of "core", since only relevant to some users, but you (kp) and I (dMb) would be willing to upgrade, test, repair etc. Should we distinguish "supported" contrib from "unsupported" contrib? Something like "primary" (instead of "core" - approx 10 packages that EVERY user will need), "secondary" (tested and supported, but not "core"), then "contrib" for the others? > - lrp's and sources are required for both to be inline with the SF > requirements. > > About write permissons: > contrib should be open to all leaf-developers, what about the core? We may > give write permissions to core by request... Access to "core" works OK by current mechanism, IMHO. > opinions? > > kp > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
