Hi Folks on 16.06.2011 21:41, Andrew wrote: > 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew: >>> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> >> >>>> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches that >>>> makes it seamless, I for shure won't oppose :) >>>> >>>> kp >>> git mv should do all job without problems. If nobody has objections - >>> IMHO we should move all on top. >> What will change for my local git? What has to be changed in the docs? >> > Just removed 'bering-uclibc4' into path
I was off list for a few days and everything changes again? Call me old fashioned, but what exactly are we buying with all those fast moves. Who designed the current tree to start with and who is communicating the quirks to do to the git repository get to get back in sync again. >>> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more >>> useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for >>> source distribution/versioning... IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the main tree, they are a nuisance there, even though it may brake the current release process. OK GIT gurus, what do I have to do to get back in sync? And please don't tell me I have to start from scratch. thanks Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
