25.10.2012 10:12, Yves Blusseau пишет: > Le 24/10/2012 19:22, Andrew a écrit : >> 24.10.2012 17:25, Yves Blusseau пишет: >>> Le 24/10/2012 15:22, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit : >>>> Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb Andrew: >>>>> Hi. >>>>> Before we decided to announce 5.0-alpha (because there is active >>>>> development process, and before release we may decide to upgrade >>>>> kernel/uClibc/toolchain, + we still not have working cross-compiled >>>>> image for non-x86 arch - for ex., some SOHO MIPS router). >>>>> >>>>> 24.10.2012 11:12, Yves Blusseau пишет: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> i think buc 5 is enough stable so a beta can be released ? >>>>>> What do you think about releasing a 5.0-beta1 ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Yves >>>> Hi; >>>> >>>> I don't mind if it's called alpha or beta, but I agree with Yves, that >>>> at least the 32-bit X86 images are in a good shape (sometimes even a bit >>>> better than 4.x) and worth a release. >>>> >>>> We also almost reached our major goals for 5.x, a toolchain that is >>>> capable to generate kernel and packages for other architectures >>>> ("arm-versatile"), although we have no image ready yet. But this is IMHO >>>> no showstopper - it can be added anytime during alpha/beta cycle. >>>> >>>> I assume that working on a bootable ARM/MIPS image may require to patch >>>> the kernel, or adding a replacement for syslinux - so we may call it >>>> alpha... >>>> >>>> BTW: What's the status of the 64bit branch? Are there plans to merge it? >>> Hi KP, >>> all compile fine except oprofile package. >>> You can use the buc5-x86_64-toolchain branch and the >>> x86_64-unknown-linux-uclibc toolchain to test. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yves >>> >> oprofile just requires libbfd assembled with -fPIC - I committed >> changes, it seems like now it's assembled correctly. > Do you know why is it working previously with 32bit toolchain without > the -fPIC flag ? No, I don't know. For some reasons libbfd under 64bit should be position-independent. >> P.S. For some reasons gcc stack protector was disabled (maybe something >> fails to compile with it); I'll try to enable it. > Great ! > > Yves
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel