24.04.2013 19:10, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> I like the idea, but the toolchain is AFAIK related to the architecture
> (see uClibc config), so we will still need one toolchain for each
> architecture, am I wrong?
Right, toolchain is dependent from architecture (for ex., ARMv5, ARMv6 
and so on), and not from platform (SoC - TI OMAP, Broadcom, Samsung 
Exynos and so on). If all SoCs are ARMv6 - they can use single 
toolchain. And single userspace apps. But for each platform (couple of 
similar SoCs from same vendor that can boot same kernel - for ex., 
Ralink RT3050/3052/3350/3352/5350/5352 and maybe RT3662/3883) we need 
separate kernel with modules.

>
> Am 23.04.2013 21:59, schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Now we have building of toolchain, userlevel apps and kernel (with
>> modules) as similar targets, with same logic. But for future embedded
>> platforms with same/similar CPU arch (but with multiple kernels - for
>> each SoC required separate kernel, possible even with different versions
>> - like rpi case) it causes some troubles. Also rebuilding from scratch
>> taints also toolchain - ~20-30% of rebuilding time.
>>
>> I think that it'll be good if we'll separate building of toolchain,
>> kernel(+modules) and userland into 3 different procedures. For this, I
>> propose to do next things:
>>
>> 1) Add 3 targets - 'build-toolchain', 'build-userspace', 'build-kernel'
>> instead of single 'build'; for toolchain - 'build-userspace' will just
>> install libs'headers from toolchain dir into staging dir. This should
>> allow to quickly rebuild only userspace soft, or only kernel, or all
>> except toolchain.
>> 2) Add tarball with kernel headers into toolchain instead of headers
>> generation from linux source (it shouldn't produce any pbs - at least
>> for some years of Gentoo usage I didn't saw pbs if headers were older
>> than kernel sources or packages were built with older headers; and more
>> - it's usual situation in Gentoo). This will remove pain of multiple
>> kernel versions into single tree and remove toolchain dependency from
>> linux kernel.
>>
>> 3) Add possibility to specify arch/version of kernel to build via
>> cmdline, and specify list of available major versions (for ex., 3.4, 3.6
>> and so on) with default one in platform makefile (currently I don't know
>> optimal method to do this). Also this should affect buildpackage.pl.
>>
>> I'll be glad to hear your ideas about this.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
>> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
>> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
>> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
>> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> leaf-devel mailing list
>> leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
>
> _______________________________________________
> leaf-devel mailing list
> leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to