Le 8 janv. 2014 à 15:37, KP Kirchdörfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net> a écrit :

> Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014, 13:05:59 schrieb Yves Blusseau:
>> Le 7 janv. 2014 à 16:01, KP Kirchdörfer <kap...@users.sourceforge.net> a 
> écrit :
>>>> If you think it’s obscur for you i can do it.
>>> 
>>> I prefer you do, that's too obscur for me :)
>> 
>> Ok i will do it but you have already merge maint-4.x into master in a wrong
>> manner. I will move all correctly but i need to know the commit to use as
>> the base for the new maint branch. Last change of the version are ‘update
>> version to 5.0.3-beta1’.
>> Is that version is the new master or the new maint ?
> 
> The last commit should be cf3698c9697532554e50929c3d7057977d9efd92 (openssl 
> updated to 1.10.1f) - this shall be the base for new maint 
> If that is done I'll intend to merge the rpi branch to master, which will 
> feature-wise move master to 5.1 with new longtime kernel 3.10 and rpi support.
> 
> 
> Is that inline with the git workflow?

Yes.
I have update the maint branch so now it’s the same as master.

You can merge the rpi branch to master but it seems there are a number of 
conflicts to resolve.

Regards,
Yves


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to