>> >> With the rules file containing this on the last line: >> DNAT net:1.1.1.1 dmz:192.168.1.243 all - >>
>Where did you get the idea that this was a correct rule? I ask that >seriously because someone else came up with that same kind of rule the >other day and I want to fix the documentation to make this clearer. The comments in the top of the /etc/shorewall/rules files seems to imply that that is a valid format. Specifically the sections PROTO and DEST PORT(s). Harold Miller -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by NW.NET's MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
