On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Webmaster - Mars Society wrote: > >> > >> With the rules file containing this on the last line: > >> DNAT net:1.1.1.1 dmz:192.168.1.243 all - > >> > > >Where did you get the idea that this was a correct rule? I ask that > >seriously because someone else came up with that same kind of rule the > >other day and I want to fix the documentation to make this clearer. > > The comments in the top of the /etc/shorewall/rules files seems to imply > that that is a valid format. Specifically the sections PROTO and DEST > PORT(s). >
And you missed the last example? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
