On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 08:05, Todd Pearsall wrote: > Making a little progress. I was able to confirm in the Cayman router > setup that it is in fact PPPoA and not PPPoE so at least I can focus > getting the PPPoA up. I'm using the Bering User's Guide PPPoA > Configuration section which uses an ATM/PCI card vs. I have the Cayman > attached to eth0. > > I'm not sure how I should be defining interfaces the example is: > > auto lo ppp0 eth0 > > iface lo inet loopback > > iface ppp0 inet ppp > provider dsl-provider > > iface eth0 inet static > address 192.168.1.254 > masklen 24 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > > What I want to do is: > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > > auto ppp0 > iface ppp0 inet ppp > provider dsl-provider eth0 <----- > > auto eth1 > iface eth1 inet static > address 192.168.1.254 > masklen 24 > broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > But the older ppp that you need for pppatm doesn't seem to support the > eth0 parameter. Should the internal be eth0 or eth1? Any ideas or > direction would be greatly appreciated. >
I recently setup a Bering box on Sprint DSL in Florida (thanks to James Sturdevant). They use PPPoE but all of the PPPoE stuff was taken care of by the modem (XyZel) so I simply turned on the modem's bridge mode and configured the bering box as a normal eth0,eth1 setup with no PPP stuff. The only bit of black magic to get the whole thing working was to power cycle the LAN switch. Stephen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
