Hi all again!  I am having trouble finding source code for the Bering
kernel.  I thought it would be in here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel
/
But there doesn't seem to be a kernel in there at all let alone the
source code.  Is it available or does it need to be made up from the
basic 2.4.20 kernel (available from Kernel.org?).

Thanks again.

David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library 
University of Western Australia
 
Telephone:   (08) 9380 3492     Fax:  (08) 9380 1012


-----Original Message-----
From: David Pitts 
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 11:32 AM
To: Lynn Avants
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe


Thanks Lynn.  I will check the conf file.  The other things are all
true.  Ie I use 192.168.1.xxx and eth1.

David Pitts
IT Services Manager
Reid Library 
University of Western Australia
 
Telephone:   (08) 9380 3492     Fax:  (08) 9380 1012


-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Avants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 11:16 AM
To: David Pitts
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] CUSeeMe


On Monday 17 March 2003 08:21 pm, David Pitts wrote:

> Thanks Lynn.
>
> The uDHCP package did work better but still not quite right.  The
> client was fine, worked like a charm, first time.  The server appears 
> to load but doesn't serve addresses.  I don't remember if I said that 
> before, but it was doing the same thing before you modified it.  I 
> just copied the package to my floppy and edited syslinux.cfg to add it

> and remove pump and dhcpd.  Is that the right process?

Yes, that is the right order. I haven't had any problems with the server
portion working with Bering-1.0. By chance, are you using "eth1" for an
internal interface, the "192.168.1.0" network addressing for your LAN,
and enabled "dhcp" for the "loc" section of Shorewall?

If any changes are made from the default Bering settings that affect
these things, you must also make the proper changes to /etc/udhcpd.conf
for the program to work. Just a WAG since I haven't had any problems
myself in testing.


> On the other question (cuseeme) I have contacted a fella who has
> developed a couple of patches which are available on patch-o-matic. 
> However, I don't have the resources to make any thing of that.  He is 
> prepared to compile the things for me though if he can.  Can you tell 
> me what flavour of Linux LEAF is based on?  I believe its Debian from 
> memory?  And can you tell me if the kernel 'newnat' support?  Or maybe

> Jaques can?

Debian Slink for the userland stuff and Debain Woody for the kernel.
Jacques has the necessary patches posted in his /devel directory.
"newnat" is something I can't say I have ever heard of.


> What do you know about patch-o-matic?  Can it create modules or must
> it patch the kernel?

It patches the kernel source.


> I'm sorry if this seems too much off the LEAF track but I would
> appreciate any assistance.

NP

-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall Developer http://leaf.sourceforge.net
http://www.guitarlynn.homelinux.org:81




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
What are you waiting for?
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to