Am Donnerstag, 29. April 2004 00:51 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi > > At 23:49 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote: > >Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :). > > > >Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does > >OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does > >(http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)? > > Super FreeS/WAN is dead,dead,dead. The work continues as either OpenS/WAN > or StrongSwan. I would love to move to StrongSwan but it is based on 2.0x > and I am not yet ready for this jump.
AFAIK FreeS/WAN development has stopped. openswan is the successor of Super FreeS/WAN based on FreeS/WAN 1.x for the openswan 1.x series and 2.x for openswan 2.x. series. StrongSwan is another fork based on FreeS/WAN 2.x. It is confusing, and maybe I'm confused totally - but after Bering(-uClibc) supported Super-FreeS/WAN a long time it's natural to me to go with openswan. correct me if I'm wrong kp ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
