At 19:35 29.04.2004, K.-P. Kirchd�rfer wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. April 2004 00:51 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi > > At 23:49 28.04.2004, Muiz Motani wrote: > >Thanks for the reply Eric. Consider this a push :). > > > >Why did you opt to go with OpenSwan rather than Super FreeS/WAN? Does > >OpenSwan contain all the patches that Super FreeS/WAN does > >(http://www.freeswan.ca/docs/freeswan-2.05/doc/web.html#patch)? > > Super FreeS/WAN is dead,dead,dead. The work continues as either OpenS/WAN > or StrongSwan. I would love to move to StrongSwan but it is based on 2.0x > and I am not yet ready for this jump.
AFAIK FreeS/WAN development has stopped. openswan is the successor of Super FreeS/WAN based on FreeS/WAN 1.x for the openswan 1.x series and 2.x for openswan 2.x. series. StrongSwan is another fork based on FreeS/WAN 2.x.
It is confusing, and maybe I'm confused totally - but after Bering(-uClibc) supported Super-FreeS/WAN a long time it's natural to me to go with openswan.
correct me if I'm wrong
Can't prove you wrong, I just feel further development in the cert/crypto sector is mostly driven by Andreas Steffen, who accidentally lives close by and is IMHO extremely knowledgeable on xxSwan (and very helpful), being the developer of the X..509 and other patches.
cheers Erich
THINK P�ntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id�66&op=click ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
