Ron, Good job on QBox. The bucket structure and the documentation is really nice.
Ron Senykoff wrote: > Hi, I'm the lead developer on QBox. > > I could work with you to isolate which exact packages and modules are > needed for you to load QBox on a non-WRAP box. I've been meaning to do > just this but havn't had the time. I've got a new version coming out > that will include support for iptables marking (fwmark) that will > allow port ranges (i.e. 10000-20000 in the case of SIP) to be > specified. > I'm using the OpenWRT project QoS features (http://wiki.openwrt.org/Faq#head-a1dc7290cc2933f9a4e9f130bb83d1dfb4b761ff) which are really, really nice. They use l7-filters (http://l7-filters.sourceforge.net) as well as fwmark classification. They also use the hfsc scheduler instead of htb. I personally think that making a pure fwmark QoS scheme for shorewall and LEAF would be the way to go. There's little need to muck around with cls_u32 rules when you already have iptables and shorewall. Also, for small sites with multiple SIP accounts which don't run their own PBX, sipproxy should be a nice addition (Eric Spakman kindly created a LEAF package of this on my request). But I'd still be interested in porting QBox to LEAF. That'd give me a good starting point for porting the useful OpenWRT features to a shorewall/iptables fwmark centric LEAF QoS scheme with l7-filters. regards, - ermo (sorry for the double post. Forgot to set the correct identity in my mail client) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
